Token Structure

​

Executive Summary

This analysis examines MIRA’s economic structure. None of the following is not financial advice. To simplify things, we will examinate a scenario where an agent controls a wallet that:

• Initially holds 10M tokens (1% of total supply)
• Wins an additional 10M tokens daily
• Will grant access to only one winner eventually

Our analysis demonstrates that MIRA’s unique mechanism creates a virtuous economic cycle that aligns individual competition with collective interest in maintaining token value. We provide mathematical evidence that participants are rationally incentivized to support token value appreciation despite competing for a single prize, creating positive network effects for the entire ecosystem.

​

1. MIRA’s Token Accumulation Mechanics

The wallet begins with just 1% of the total supply (10M of 1B tokens) but rapidly accumulates a significant portion of all tokens in existence through its daily acquisition mechanism (battles). Note: The MIRA wallet will exceed the original total supply after approximately 99 days, creating a critical inflection point in the token economics.

​

2. MIRA’s Value Proposition: Price Appreciation Impact on Winner’s Prize

The prize value for the winner of an agent’s wallet is dramatically affected by token price trajectory. We model three scenarios:

• Declining Price: Initial price 0.10, declining to 0.01 after one year
• Stable Price: Constant $0.10 price
• Growing Price: Initial price 0.10, growing to 1.00 after one year

Key: After one year of participation in MIRA, the winner receives 100 times more value in a growing price scenario compared to a declining price scenario. This creates a powerful incentive for all MIRA participants to support token value appreciation, aligning individual and collective interests.

​

3. Mathematical Proof of MIRA’s Value Optimization

The value advantage of a growing price scenario versus a declining one in the MIRA ecosystem is defined by: $\text{Value Advantage} = \text{Tokens}_{365} \times (\text{Price}_{\text{Growing}} - \text{Price}_{\text{Declining}})$ Substituting our values: $\text{Value Advantage} = 3,660,000,000 \times ($1.00 - $0.01) =$3,623,400,000$ This enormous value differential (100×) quantitatively demonstrates why maintaining and growing token value is essential in MIRA’s contest structure, and why rational participants will work to support the token ecosystem.

​

4. MIRA’s Network Effects and Participation Incentives

As more people participate in MIRA, they create buying pressure on the token, which increases its price and consequently the wallet’s value. Our calculations show the impact of participation on MIRA wallet value: Assumptions: Each participant adds $100 in buy pressure; calculations based on 365-day accumulated tokens. MIRA’s structure creates a self-reinforcing network effect where each new participant increases the value proposition for all existing participants.

​

5. MIRA’s Compounding Effect on Reinvestment

If tokens earned daily in the MIRA ecosystem can be sold and reinvested in other assets, the stable or growing price scenarios massively outperform declining price scenarios: Note: These calculations account for the daily reinvestment of token earnings at the specified annual return rate within the MIRA ecosystem. Even modest reinvestment rates produce dramatically better outcomes in scenarios where the MIRA token maintains or increases in value.

​

6. MIRA’s Supply-Demand Dynamics

As the MIRA AI wallet accumulates tokens, a diminishing supply remains available for trading, creating natural price support. The wallet’s accumulation rate creates an accelerating scarcity curve: Scarcity Factor = Initial Available Supply ÷ Remaining Supply This natural scarcity mechanism in MIRA creates price support even without additional interventions.

​

7. Game Theory Analysis of MIRA

MIRA’s single-winner structure creates a fascinating game theory scenario:

• Collective Interest: All participants benefit from token price appreciation
• Individual Competition: Only one participant will ultimately win
• Optimal Strategy: Support token adoption while competing for the win
• Nash Equilibrium: No participant has an incentive to sell tokens if others are holding

This creates what we term “collaborative competition” — a scenario where competing participants are incentivized to collaborate on specific goals. MIRA elegantly solves the prisoner’s dilemma by aligning individual and collective incentives. The Nash Equilibrium in MIRA is for all participants to hold and support token value, even though they are competing for a single prize.

​

8. Conclusion: MIRA’s Value Appreciation Imperative

Our analysis demonstrates conclusively that MIRA’s economic design creates a self-reinforcing positive cycle:

1. Exponential Prize Growth: The winner’s prize can be up to 100× larger with price appreciation
2. Network Effect Acceleration: Each new participant increases prize value for everyone
3. Supply-Demand Advantage: Natural scarcity creates organic price support
4. Game Theory Alignment: Individual and collective incentives are unusually well-aligned

MIRA ingeniously converts what would typically be a zero-sum competition into a positive-sum game where supporting ecosystem growth maximizes the reward for the ultimate winner. This represents a novel approach to token economics that could set new standards for economic design in decentralized systems.

​

Appendix: Methodology

Calculations for MIRA’s economic analysis are based on the following parameters:

• Initial wallet balance: 10,000,000 tokens
• Daily token accumulation: 10,000,000 tokens
• Total token supply: 1,000,000,000 tokens
• Price scenarios:
  • Declining: $0.10 →$0.01
  • Stable: $0.10 constant
  • Growing: $0.10 →$1.00
• Participant impact: $100 buy pressure per participant
• Time periods: 30, 90, 180, and 365 days

All calculations were performed using time-weighted analysis to account for the changing token accumulation and price dynamics over time in the MIRA ecosystem.